23 juin 2010 |
Crackdown 2: “Pacific City Comparison”This confirms my feeling when I played the demo: they screwed it up. Except for co-op, they didn’t improve on what should be improved, and made it a bit worse in other aspects. |
|
17 juin 2010 |
|
“Mad Catz: Microsoft ceasing production of Xbox 360 Wireless Racing Wheel”
If true, this is great news — meaning that Forza Motorsport will not be restricted to using Microsoft’s crappy wheel anymore, and we should soon be able to get Logitech wheels. Just in time to counter Gran Turismo 5, but a little too late as it should have happened in time for the release of Forza 3. If there isn’t a free update to version 3 to support third-party wheels, I’m definitely not going to buy Forza 4. |
|
|
Forget it. I'll never win the poker game in Blackwater, so I'll never get 100% completion. |
|
16 juin 2010 |
|
“PlayStation Move controller gets ray gun accessory” That’s kinda-really cool. It nicely complements the controller’s design, and is a pretty good compromise between looking too threatening and looking too much like a toy. (But there’s gonna be some cognitive dissonance when you start playing Killzone 3 with this.) |
|
|
“Impressions On Assassin’s Creed Brotherhood’s Multiplayer”
I can’t see the Xbox Live crowd going for that, but it sounds like a very cool concept — going for more real stealth than the single-player can afford to, because the AI would cheat (or it would feel like it did). |
|
Red Dead Redemption (360) |
|
|
“PlayStation Move coming in September starting at $50” No, it’s not, and I’m disappointed to see that headline on Ars Technica. Move “starts at $50” for people who only want the main controller (i.e., without the nunchuk), intend to play alone, and already own a PlayStation Eye. Who the hell does? PlayStation Move starts at $99. Which is relatively reasonable, except that it still means it’s for only one player and doesn’t include the nunchuk. (Not to mention that some games, such as the bow simulator, seem to require two main controllers for a single player.)
At least now there’s no way Microsoft can launch Kinect at $150. (I hadn’t realized that the reason why they didn’t announce a price yesterday might just have been that they wanted to see what Sony would do.) |
|
15 juin 2010 |
|
The Zelda presentation is a complete mess, but it's very interesting they've given up on pointing at the screen, and use MotionPlus instead. |
|
|
Ubisoft introduces home laser tag that interfaces with your PC. It's all Barney Stintson's fault. |
|
|
“GameStop gives Kinect $149.99 price”
I’m not sure that GameStop actually knows more than we do (I don’t think they’re above pulling the price out of thin air, and I’m somewhat surprised that they’d have gotten a definite price even though the thing will only launch in November) but the point is that Microsoft didn’t name a price during their keynote, and at this point in their media plan it can only mean that it won’t be cheap. This is mind-boggling because, apart from the consultancy fees to imagine that dreadful name (which, to make matters worse, is apparently pronounced “connect”), the thing is just a couple of webcams and a tiny motor! (Okay, I know, the magic is in the software. But the thing with software is that you do make it up in volume.) Chances are they’re counting on the $299 pack to seduce non-gamers who bought a Wii. That price point is indeed affordable, but there are two big mistakes here: First, those people have already bought a Wii, and I doubt they can easily be convinced to spend $299 again for another console they won’t use (much) either. Second, the Wii’s success was mostly viral, and existing 360 owners would love nothing more than demo Kinect to their relatives in order to convince them to buy one — if the standalone Kinect was cheap enough for them to be interested. At $150, a huge majority of them will not be. |
|
|
“360 250GB "Slim" hands-on, full details” I won’t be convinced by everyone on the show floor saying that they find it sexy when they see it in real life: I just don’t like the design. But a smaller console, with less noise, less heat, better connectivity and a 250GB hard drive for the same price as the existing model — all of that sounds pretty good, even in an awkward package. Funny that they didn’t announce the “Arcade” equivalent of the new model, yet did confirm that they’re not manufacturing the old console anymore, but waiting for stocks to wear out. It’s not like anyone can believe they would kill the lower price points and only keep the $299 option, so they’re really aiming the old consoles still on the shelves at suckers. I’m quite impressed by their pulling a Google at the E3 conference, offering a brand new 360 to everyone in the audience; all in all, the keynote had a fairly uneventful lineup, but was really well done (except for the random hipster — loved when one of the devs he introduced thanked “Lorenzo Lamas” and the guy went, in the background, “what the f… fuck!”). |
|
14 juin 2010 |
|
I'm so traumatized by Red Dead Redemption's cougars that I have a little adrenaline spike every time I see the cat move in the hallway. |
|
12 juin 2010 |
|
The depressing atmosphere of Red Dead Redemption is having a visible effect on my mood. |
|
10 juin 2010 |
Zero Punctuation : Red Dead RedemptionHeh, I forgot to mention: the very first thing I did as soon as I got to Armadillo was… shoot a dog. Bam, $5 bounty (with not a penny in my satchel), and I have no idea why I did that. I also like how Yahtzee captures the satisfaction of shooting your first fucking cougar after you’ve been killed several times by its cousins. |
|
9 juin 2010 |
|
Scratch that; two fucking cougars killed two of my horses in succession. |
|
|
A fucking cougar just killed my handsome stallion. |
|
2 juin 2010 |
|
I'm glad the Blur betademo is back on. I'd almost consider buying the game if there weren't more interesting releases just about now. |
|
2000 • 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2001 • 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2002 • 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2003 • 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2004 • 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2005 • 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2006 • 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2007 • 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2008 • 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 |